Fujifilm X-M5, quick review

Fujifilm announced the X-M5 last October. As the cheapest camera body in the X-series, it is positioned as the content creator camera — read “for video”. Looking at replacing my no longer working Canon G7X MkII for which an exact replacement was not available as Canon failed to deliver, either a MkII or MkIII, I felt that the Fuji could be the one. As I have already invested in the system, the interchangeable lens aspect is really a good proposal.

In late April, a month after ordering it from my local camera store, I picked up an X-M5. This is the “kit” version. It comes in a brown cardboard box, with cardboard form inserts to protect both the body and the lens, that are plastic wrapped. Previous cameras I got came in a black box, including the 27mm f2.8 R WR.

What’s in the box

– Fujfilm X-M5 camera
– NP W126S battery, barely charged
– XC 15-45mm f3.5-5.6 OIS PZ lens
– a Fujifilm strap
– Some papers with QR code
– Something about a software trial

Missing: USB-C cable to charge, or a charger, and a paper manual. In my case I do have a charger as the X-M5 uses the same NP-W126S battery as the X-T3, but I wonder how it goes with people that don’t already have that. I find that cheap to some extent.

This is the silver version. I wish I could have gotten a black one, but it wasn’t available.

Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 f3.5-5.6 OIS PZ
Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 f3.5-5.6 OIS PZ

What’s not?

Just to get this behind us, as it was all over the internet chatter as this is probably the most criticism from the reviewers: the X-M5 doesn’t have IBIS (In Body Image Stabilisation). I believe it’s a choice to keep the cost down, and maybe the size. We won’t complain about it.

Ergonomics

The camera body is small. Really small. It comes with a fully articulated LCD screen that swivel 180° to allow back or front viewing. This is one of the feature I came for, even though I had never used one. In a quick test shooting stills with the LCD screen as a viewfinder, I found the tiltable screen on the X-T3 more convenient than the swivel out screen: if you need to orient the screen you have to flip out and rotate, giving the camera some sort of wing. This might be more versatile, but it neither is discrete nor compact. However if you need a screen facing forward this works great. The side is not encumbered with connectors.

Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 with the screen tilted outwards
Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 with the screen tilted outwards
Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 viewed from the back with the screen.
Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 viewed from the back with the screen.

A lot of the user interface goes through the touch screen or through menus, and those familiar with other Fujifilm camera will feel at ease. There are a few dedicated and configurable buttons. There is also the mode dial that allow selecting still modes P S A M as well as the full auto, the two video modes vlog and movies, the filter mode and four customizable custom modes, C1 to C4. The more notable is the film simulation dial on the left side.

To the right of the screen on the rear there are three controls. A joystick and two buttons DISP/BACK and MENU/OK all used to access and navigate the menu.

Back of the Fujifilm X-M5. To the left, the screen and to the right the rear control buttons: DISP/BACK, MENU/OK and the multi directional joystick.
Back of the Fujifilm X-M5 with the screen and the rear control buttons.

There is no d-pad, but the joystick is used to control focus points, and by default pressing it zooms in manual focus. With my bug hands this gets in the way zooming being triggered way too often. After disabling it to just “center the focus area” it’s better. But I have still found situations where the display inexplicably zooms; bug or some other setting I need to change, I still haven’t found how or why.

A view of the front command dial of the Fuijfilm X-M5. Above is the shutter button, the record button with a red dot, the reat dial and the mode dial. Below the silver top part of the camera is the black grip.
Front command dial of the Fuijfilm X-M5

The front command dial with the combination of press and dial allows controlling various parameters. By default it changes the exposure (aperture, shutter speed or program shift depending on the mode), and if you press you can toggle to a different parameter like ISO or film simulation (when in C film simulation). It is configurable per mode (P S A M) along with the rear command dial, and can have up to 4 parameters set. Also very long press on the front command dial open the menu to configure it.

The rear command dial of the Fujifilm X-M5. To its upper left the record button with a red dot, to its up right the shutter, and to its left the control dial.
Rear command dial of the Fujifilm X-M5.

The rear command dial by default changes the exposure compensation in P S A and the shutter speed in M.

The only parameters that can be assigned to either are Shutter Speed (S and M), Aperture (A and M), Program Shift (P), Exposure Compensation, ISO and Film simulation. With the front command dial you can assign up to 4 functions and toggle them by a press. The screen will have an indicator showing which of the parameter is changed by the dial (also in blue colour).

A long press on the front command dial will directly lead you to the menu to configure both command dials in P S A M. I end up mistakenly doing so far too many times and I just wish I could disable this.

If you use a lens that has an aperture ring, the command dial will only work if the lens is in A mode. Otherwise the aperture set on lens prevails.

The top plate of the X-M5. From left to right: the hot shoot, the mode dial, the Q button on the bottom side, the shutter button with on/off switch on the top edge, the back control wheel on the bottom edge and the red dotted record button just above the wheel.

The Q button will bring up the Q menu: quick settings on screen to be changed. The navigation in the Q menu is similar to the other Fujifilm cameras: the joystick or the front command dial change the selected item, and the rear command dial change the value. What the Q button does can be changed. Long pressing on the Q when configured to show the Q menu brings the configuration to customize the Q menu.

The (record) button will by default start movie recording, even in still mode. This also can be reconfigured to perform a different function.

The AE-L/AF-L button will be default lock exposure and auto-focus. Auto-focus focus lock also trigger the focusing when in manual focus, if applicable. The button can be reconfigured to change what is performed when pressing it.

Then there is the playback button, and the Drive / (delete) button. That last one act differently depending whether you are in playback mode or not. In playback mode it is used to enter the delete picture menu. In shooting mode it shows the menu to select the drive mode, which allow selecting a burst mode, bracketing mode, HDR, panorama or multiple exposure. The button has no effect when shooting videos.

Film simulation dial

The X-M5 also feature the film simulation dial that first appeared on the X-T50. The dial position is a hard coded setting, but it offers the C mode where the film simulation is set in the menu, and the FS1 to FS3 positions where you can set a film simulation for each of the mode: still or video. Interestingly in the movie mode (not vlog) the dial is ignored and the simulation is set like in C mode.

The film simulation dial of the X-M5. It has various symbols with letters denoting specific film simulations CC for Classic Chrome or V for Velvia. Also in some positions C, FS1, FS2 and FS3. The center of the dial is labelled FILM. Just below is a button labelled DRIVE with a trashcan icon, and there is the covered mic input.
The film simulation dial of the Fujifilm X-M5.

There are a few positions where the film simulation can be changed without turning the dial. C is the custom mode. You can use the Q button, or the front control dial (press, scroll to the FILM position and then you can scroll through the film modes). Both the Acros or black & white film simulations can be configured further in the menu to select the colour filter: STD (none), Ye (yellow), R (red) or G (green). The latter isn’t accessible from the dial. There is also a sepia mode.
The FS1 to FS3 positions allow configuring film simulation for each of Still and Movies, so you can use different simulations between still image mode and vlog without touching the dial.

There is a big missed opportunity: using the FS1 to FS3 settings for film recipes instead of just the film simulation. Since I started writing this, Fujifilm announced the X-E5. It also has a film simulation dial, and Fujifilm added the film recipes, where you can set all the processing parameters a film recipe consist of for any of the FS1 to FS3 custom position. On would hope Fujifilm would provide a kaizen update to provide this, it’s definitely not the just released update.

Also the X-M5 is supposed to be for “content creators”, ie for people shooting a lot of video, and I don’t think this is a feature for that use case. I feel it’s an attempt to straddle the two market segments.

Video

I bought the X-M5 for that usage: video.

The camera offers two video mode: vlog and (movie). They have both separate settings including frame rate. Setting the camera in one of the two movie modes make the main shutter button the recording start stop trigger.

I set up the video to shoot 1080p@23.98, aperture priority, Eterna film simulation, plugged in my old Azden shotgun mic, and then shot a sample. It sounds ok, it’s a no-brainer. The X-M5 shoots up to 6.2K “open gate”, only in 3:2 aspect ratio. 4K and and 1080p are available in 16:9 and 17:9 aspect ratio. It supports standard framerates from 23.98P to 59.94P. Also for the content creator part you can shoot vertical video in 9:16 without having to rotate the camera. There is a high-speed recording mode recording in 100P, 120P, 200P and 240P dedicated to slow-motion. It can record in h264 and h265, with PCM or AAC sound, at various bit rates, and you can record in F-Log and F-Log2 or HLG for better colour grading when editing.

The vlog mode adds a few quick access. The short vertical move mode allow toggle quickly the recording mode. In that mode the format switches to mp4 sound recording.

When recording a video, the frame on the screen is red, offering a very visible indicator that it is rolling.

According to the manual, the microphone input doesn’t support phantom power (power through the jack). This is kind of an annoyance as most of the small battery-less camera microphones like Røde’s Video Micro II require this. However, I bought one, and it just work. Maybe it’s a disclaimer that some devices may not work, but I wished there actually was an official compatibility list of some sort.

The Røde Video Micro II with a deadcat wind screen mounted on the Fujifilm X-M5
The Røde Video Micro with a deadcat wind screen mounted on the Fujifilm X-M5

When the mode dial is one of the still picture mode (AUTO, P S A M) you can press the video record button to start filming a video. While this will honour the film simulation mode and other video settings, it will switch to an auto-exposure mode regardless of the the still mode, which have a strong effect on the shutter angle or the depth of field.

Not tested: the X-M5 offer recording (including in raw) over HDMI to external recorders. There is also the option to add a cooling fan (Fujifilm FAN-001) to allow shooting for longer periods of time. Its positioning make the screen always folded out.

Battery life

The X-M5 comes with the NP-W126S battery which is the “small” battery for Fujifilm. People wished it used the NP-W235 like on the X-S20, but its bigger size is really something that would impact the size of the camera.

The kit lens

Released in 2017, the XC 15-45mm f3.5-5.6 OIS PZ kit lens is part of the XC series, a less expensive line of lenses. For only CA$120 extra on top of the body only configuration, you get a reasonable multi purpose lens with optical image stabilisation. The light plasticky construction is on par with the price. The zoom is controlled by the wire (motorised), and there is no aperture ring. The focusing ring at the front automatically control the zoom when in autofocus mode. On power up the lens extends to be almost twice as long. At the widest it is the longest and the shortest is in the middle around 24mm, and at 45mm it is still shorter than at 15mm.

The Fujinon XC14-45 lens mounted on the Fujifilm X-M5. The from is extended being 1/3 of the length of the lens.
Fujifilm X-M5 with the XC15-45 f3.5-5.6 OIS PZ extended

The power zoom control is a zoom in / out toggle ring, which I personally don’t like; it’s not dissimilar to the rocker switch found on point and shoot cameras or even camcorders, and regardless of the directional settings, I always turn it the wrong way. Also why can’t I control the zoom form a button on the camera body? Canon got this with the EOS R 50V. I found it to be very slow compared to the manual ring operation of the 18-55 and other zoom I have used. The need for the lens to extend when powering on makes the camera take longer to be ready. You need to be aware of this as you can miss shots due to the camera not being ready.

The lens show some distortion at both ends. The distortion is handled in-camera for the JPEG and movies, and should be with most raw conversion software.

At 15mm there is some strong barrel distortion:

Two mostly identical pictures. The one on the right show barrel distortion.
On the left, the JPEG with correction, on the right, the raw without correction.

At 45mm there is some pincushion distortion:

Two mostly identical pictures. The one on the right show pincushion distortion.
JPEG (left) vs raw (right) show the distortion of the XC 14-45mm at 45mm

Adapted lenses

Like any other X-Series, the X-M5 support using adapted lenses. You need to enable the Shoot without lens option in the menus. One of the changes I see from the X-T3 is that you can enter a complete name for the adapted lenses to be added to the image metadata. While this doesn’t impact anything when it comes to picture taking it’s a very nice detail for those that are a stickler for metadata. It’s not unique to the X-M5 as it is also on other cameras more recent than the X-T3.

The camera doesn’t automatically switch to manual focus when you use an adapted lens. You need switch to MF using the Q menu, and make sure you have manual focus assist like focus peaking enabled: it’s only enabled in manual focus.

Conclusion

It is a small compact camera, well priced, that is completely compatible with the Fujifilm X system. Its video capabilities are quite extensive, better than many of the competition more expensive cameras. The lack of EVF wouldn’t make me choose this camera for photography. If you really are on a budget and/or want the flip out screen for video, this is the one as it is as capable as the more expensive model. Feature wise the X-S20 would bring a bigger battery and an EVF, minus the vlog mode.

Like
– Priced well.
– Size.
– Good performance for the size / price.
– Fully articulated screen.

Meh
– The film simulation dial.

Dislike
– The box content: no charger nor cable to charge, no paper manual.
– No EVF.

Good to know
– Not the latest X-Trans sensor, only 26 megapixel.
– No IBIS.

Comparables

At CA$1079 body only or CA$1199 with the kit lens, the Fujifilm X-M5 competes in the same segment as the Sony ZV-E10 (CA$899) and ZV-E10 II (CA$1399), the Canon R50 V (CA$1279 with kit lens) and Nikon Z30 (CA$879). The Panasonic S9 (CA$2149) and Sony ZV-E1 (CA$2999) represent a higher end of the “content creator” segment with a full frame sensor and the higher price tag attached.

Images

I took the X-M5 on a quick work trip to Europe and I used it more for video than stills as I also had the X-T3. The viewfinder really matters. Here are some images taken with the X-M5, straight out of camera JPEG (one was HEIF, converted to JPEG). The black & white one was accidental as apparently I bumped into the film simulation, and while the display showed it, the combination of dull overcast weather and outdoor readability of the LCD made that I didn’t realise at the time. Worked out better that way though.

Instax Square Link

I just bought a Fujifilm Instax Square Link. It is a device that print Instax Square picture. Send from your smartphone a picture, obtain a hard copy on Instax Square instant film. If you have an Instax Mini Link, this is the same for Instax Square.

What’s in the box?

The box contains the printer, a light manual and a USB-C to A cable for charging.

The printer is battery powered (hence the cable). There is no film. I got a pack of white border and a pack of black borders.

The printer is like a big bar of soap. It is still slightly larger than my Instax Mini 90 Neo camera, but that’s to factor in the difference in size of the film pack.

I has two buttons, large one having a LED to show the status, a large door at the back for the film cartridge and a small trap door hiding the USB charging port and a reset hole. The latter is for cases where the troubleshooting involve turning it off and on. There is no display, like for the number of frames left.

The Instax Square Link compared for size to an Instax Mini 90. Both are roughly the same size.
The Instax Square Link compared for size to an Instax Mini 90

The initial setup consist of charging the printer using the provided USB cable (or any USB-C cable for that matter) and a charger (not included); and loading the instax square cartridge. That step is exactly the same as loading you favourite Instax camera.

To turn the printer on, press the big button for a solid second, it will light up white. The colour will change to flashing purple when printing

Print job

Screenshot of the Instax Square Link app

To use it you need a compatible smart phone (Android or iOS), install the Instax app and connect to the printer with Bluetooth. Within the app you can select images to print, and it’s fairly easy. There are other features within the app but beside the collage or frame print, I really don’t get it.

From my phone I printed a picture I posted a while ago on Instagram, works great. I also printed a picture I took recently directly with my phone. As long that the image is on your phone, you can print it.

Once you printed a picture, you can press the smaller button to reprint it, until the printer turns off. Otherwise you can use the application history to re-print later on. In some circumstance it doesn’t recollect the picture printed on the iOS app. This seems to happen if you use “share” to the Instax Link Square instead of selecting the picture from the application.

The Instax Square Link printer is ejecting the print with the picture face down.
The Instax Square Link ejecting the print.

Fujifilm manual state that the print takes 90 seconds to develop, but in my tests after 2 minutes it wasn’t developed.

The print facing is leaning against the printer. The image is not completely developed.
The print developing after 2 minutes.

In the end you obtain a colourful print.

The colourful print is flat on top of the printer, fully developed.
Print from the Instax Square Printer

The output ressemble a lot to the scan.

Instax Camera

One of the feature in the app is the “Instax Camera”. It is basically the camera app to take the picture before printing it. It put the live view inside a small Instax frame. It allow adding the date time superimposed, printed as a 9 segments led display, another bout of nostalgia that the demographics of that device have no recollection of.

Cost

The printer cost CA$180 (I got mine on sale at CA$160). On regular price, it’s priced between the SQ1, the cheapest Instax Square and the SQ40 the more comprehensive model. It’s not gonna break the bank.

The 2x 10-pack of film with white borders was CA$28, and the single 10-pack of black border was CA$17. That make a cost per print to CA$1.40 for the white border and CA$1.70 for the black border. There are other colours a bit more fancy if you like. You can buy the white border film in bigger pack which bring down the price per unit. A 100 pack bring the cost down to CA$1.20 a print. Also while I can find Instax Mini at my local pharmacy, Instax Square is less common. This is to be considered if you need resupplies in a hurry.

The tinfoiled pack of film leaning against the cardboard packaging that contain 2.
Instax Square film pack in its protective packaging as coming out of the box

Specs

The image size is a 62mm square (2.4in). The image printed is 800×800 pixels, which boils to 318 dpi. That’s a resolution similar to any print you got from a minilab. According to the manufacturer you can print around 100 pictures (that’s 10 packs) with a single recharge.

Verdict

Pros:

– Simple to use.
– Device reasonably priced.
– Battery powered.
– Output quality.

Cons:

– Requires a phone app, very limited interoperability.
– Unlike older models can’t be used from a Fuji-X camera.
– What will die first? The printing mechanism or its battery that can’t be replaced.

After thoughts

I enjoy using my Instax Mini but I’m often left off guard with the quality, and it seem all related to the optics on the camera and the exposure, with a limited dynamic range. It’s possibly part of the challenge. The printer demonstrate that the film rendition is good and that an hybrid like the Instax Mini Evo would probably offer similar results. Sadly the hybrid Instax Square SQ10 and SQ20 cameras that were in the earlier Instax Square lineup are no more so the search for a better image quality will probably need to be sought out of the other camare makers like Lomography, MINT or NONS.

Previously: NONS instant cameras

Thorsten Overgaard review of the Leica Q

Danish photographer Thorsten Overgaard has a very comprehensive review on the Leica Q (from May 2015). A camera not without quirks though:

I must say the Auto Focus caused me a few problems at f/1.7 in that I some times unknowingly had been focusing at the background between two main subjects in the foreground that I thought I had nailed the focus on. As time has gone by, I have gotten the hang of it. I think.

Then Overgaard goes on explaining how to use various features of the camera properly. Read thoroughly if you have a Leica Q, or are simply curious.

Craig Mod reviews the Leica Q

In 2010, Craig Mod wrote the GF1 field test — 16 Days in the Himalayas, a very compelling essay advocating Micro4/3 cameras, with the Panasonic GF1 and the 20mm f1.7. And what a gorgeous location. Later in November he wrote Seeing prime, an essay reviewing the Lumix 14mm f.2.5 and photography with a prime lens.

The in December 2013, not necessarily and change of heart but more like evidence of the shift of the whole industry Cameras, Goodbye where the iPhone quality reach the one of bigger cameras that don’t have the online features — something that the author found important. A testimonial about camera phones, with the iPhone spearheading, taking over the compact camera market.

Then come his essay The Leica Q where he took the Leica Q on a field test for six month:

I now understand the limitations of this photographic instrument, of which there are few. And I trust and enjoy it more than any other camera I’ve owned.

Yes, even more than my iPhone.

Read the whole essay — six month of use in the field is quite long enough to have a definitive opinion. It feels that Leica managed to make an attractive camera priced not too insanely above of the Sony RX1 (+ EVF to compare). This echoes quite well the early reviews back in June.

Sony DSC-RX1 Review

James Duncan Davidson reviews the Sony RX1. Gorgeous pictures, very nice website layiout.

His conclusion:

As of February 2013, this camera sets the bar for all compact digital cameras to meet. Finally, after thousands of words, only two more are needed: Highly recommended.

I still believe this camera is too expensive as the full frame sensor is not needed: they could have pulled it with an APS-C sensor and a smaller dedicated lens with a lower price ; and the nickel and diming of not having a battery charger. Not for me, but for the rest I’ll trust the review.

X-Pro1 reviews

Fuji X-Pro1 reviews are starting to appear.

Japan Camera hunter ask whether the Fuji X-Pro1 is the first real consumer rangefinder (archived from the original) or not.

It could be said that this site has a bias towards film cameras, but that is not entirely true. I just don’t often find digital cameras that I like. Until now…

It should be noted also that:

Let’s just be clear though… This is not actually a rangefinder camera. It is a rangefinder ‘style’ camera. This is a mirrorless digital camera and is not actually using a rangefinder system.

Nonetheless the question raised is whether the X-Pro1 can replace a rangefinder cameras. The X-100 seems to be making people happy.

Then Zack Arias who loved his X-100 got offered to test the X-Pro1.

… as I unboxed it I think I said OMG 26 times in a row.

And he did. See his series on Dubai 01, 02, 03, 04.

Last but not least. Roel was lucky to get a sample on loan by Fujifilm and got a First Look at the X-Pro1:

Fujifilm claimed that they would get full frame sensor quality out of a compact camera when they announced the X-Pro1. I believe that they have largely achieved that goal.

Image quality on overall has to rock if you want to satisfy rangefinder users. The current samples look promising.

I can’t wait to get mine.

The Online Photographer: Shooting with a Fuji X100

The Online Photographer has a guest post by Robert Plotkin: Shooting with a Fuji X100.

Plotkin has a lots of gripes against the focusing system:

The imprecise focusing takes an unusually long time. It is like waiting for a cashier to incorrectly manipulate an abacus and hand you the wrong change.

He also have issues with the usability. But in the end:

Shooting the Fuji X100 is like driving a vintage Ferrari: bugs in your teeth, pebbles ricocheting off your goggles, double-clutching straight cut gears, applying opposite lock to correct a slide — and coming out of the corner neck-and-neck with a soccer mom in a black Escalade of an SLR.

Read it thoroughly. I still want to get one.