â€œWhat I took away from this is that film basically canâ€™t be overexposed, it can just be too dense for the scanner to be able to shoot through the negative. But the information will always be there.â€
My quick take is that you can shoot it at +2 and it will be more tolerant to under exposure error.
Strangely, disposable cameras still sell well in comparison, and Ilford is just trying to capitalize on this. There is a version with processing included for the HP5 film as it is traditional B&W. The XP2 film can be processed anywhere as it is C-41 process.
End of January, Lomography announced the LomoChrome Purple, a colour negative film design to achieve effects similar to the long discontinued Kodak EIR inversible film. The 35mm version is already sold out, but the 120 will cost you around $60 for a five pack, on pre-order.
Alright, developing C-41 is pretty similar to the black and white process. The equipment is the same, so just check out my previous post on developing equipment to know what you will need. All of it applies â€“ developing tank, beakers, thermometer, timer â€“ all that. The chemistry is different but again, thereâ€™s developer, thereâ€™s fixer, and thereâ€™s something afterwards. The process, while different in order and times, is also very similar to the black and white process, so if youâ€™ve worked black and white before, you should have no trouble with C-41.
My take: it might be harder to obtain the chemicals than to actually do it.
It is sad to see this happening, but ever falling sales of film made the enterprise even less viable. I just wish there was a company that was able to manufacture and process a Kodachrome-like film in the future, as it was the best color slide film, with unbelievable archival quality, unrivaled by the E-6 chemistry based slide films.
I just regret to not have shot enough of it, none of them in America.