Personal ramblings on photography
Via the photographblog, Fujifilm to discontinue Fujichrome Velvia 100F in 35mm, 120 and 4×5 formats and Velvia 50 in 4×5 and 8×10. Last shipment in December 2012 for the UK.
This is sad, even for the Velvia 50 at it represent one of the best color film today for landscape. The market for inversible color film is shrinking even more.
Before the release of the camera, Zack Arias tested the X-Pro1 for Fujifilm in Mumbai. While this is a promotional video for Fujifilm, just watch Zack working, and the images he made:
I also linked to Zack reviews in the past.
You might wonder why your camera GPS might not operate in China. Stefan Geens explain us why Panasonic, Leica, FujiFilm, Samsung and Nikon censor their GPS cameras. The tl;dr version is to respect the law China about GPS devices sales and usage. Note that they are not the only manufacturers.
I don’t know if my Holux GPS would work in China, but I bought it from Hong Kong.
Minh Thein on Petapixel has some thoughts on digital camera lifespan”
In the film days, the camera body and lenses lasted a long time; you invested in glass, got a decent body — one that fulfilled your personal needs as a photographer — and then picked the right film for the job. In that sense, image quality differences between brands were down to the lenses and the photographer.
[…]
Bottom line: the camera body now plays a much more critical role in the imaging chain because it also contains the “film”, and this isn’t something you can change when the equivalent of a new emulsion is released.
Before you increased the technical image quality with better lenses and better film. A 1950 Leica M can use modern Leica glass and modern film. Still the same camera body.
Also another point Thein raise is how digital camera are obsoleted by unavailability of things like batteries, and the risk of losing ones archive with file format incompatibilities, *cough* RAW *cough* , as well as storage solutions.
This is something to be thought about with our society being more and more throw away. I wonder if the amount of e-waste isn’t worse than the chemicals used for film processing and printing.
Ctein at The Online Photographer is not saying the Fuji X-Pro1 sucks, but he is saying that several of the flaws from the camera make it a bad choice for him.
The eye level viewfinder is a letdown. I’m left-eyed, which means whenever I use that viewfinder I put a great big greasy nose print in the middle of the LCD screen. LCD screens are my preferred way to work.
Same problem with rangefinder – and actually most cameras since they are all designed for right handed and right eyed people. But what make the Fujifilm X-Pro1 attractive is the optical viewfinder. Given that his preferred way is the LCD screen, it is already moot.
There’s no way to zoom in by more than a factor of two when reviewing RAW photographs. That won’t tell me if my focus is correct, if there’s subject movement, or how noisy the photograph might be. It’s barely enough to judge facial expressions.
[…]
If I capture RAW plus JPEG, I can zoom all the way in. It’s kind of dumb, and I just waste time later throwing away the JPEGs (I have no use for them), but it works.
That’s unfortunate and I indeed wish Fujifilm would fix these.